A great leader like FDR could only serve the country for 6 years
rather than 8.
Answer: A good ex-president can be used as a senior advisor.
President Hoover was a senior advisor under both Presidents
Truman and Eisenhower.
The nation would be stuck with a bad president: for 6 instead of only
4 years.
Answer: That president might have been better if free to choose
people from both parties for the cabinet and staff for that single
6-year term.
A president with no future reelection is a lame duck and lacks clout.
Answer: Senator Mike Mansfield refuted that argument at the
Congressional Hearing:
The same is true today as soon as a President has been reelected to a
second term — the 22nd Amendment saw to that. Lameness relates to
the strength and quality of the person. If a president becomes a lame
duck, it is not because of any inhibitions imposed by a single term. An
unlimited number of terms would not sustain such a person. On the
other hand, a six-year President who rises to his responsibilities will
have sufficient time to organize an effective and successful
administration.



1 Six-year Term for U.S. President
ARGUMENTS AGAINST