|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A great leader like FDR could only serve the country for 6 years rather than 8. Answer: A good ex-president can be used as a senior advisor. President Hoover was a senior advisor under both Presidents Truman and Eisenhower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The nation would be stuck with a bad president: for 6 instead of only 4 years. Answer: That president might have been better if free to choose people from both parties for the cabinet and staff for that single 6-year term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
A president with no future reelection is a lame duck and lacks clout. Answer: Senator Mike Mansfield refuted that argument at the Congressional Hearing: “The same is true today as soon as a President has been reelected to a second term — the 22nd Amendment saw to that. Lameness relates to the strength and quality of the person. If a president becomes a lame duck, it is not because of any inhibitions imposed by a single term. An unlimited number of terms would not sustain such a person. On the other hand, a six-year President who rises to his responsibilities will have sufficient time to organize an effective and successful administration.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|